Have the facts finally caught up to Donald Trump?
The old law school aphorism holds that “if the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell.”
With Tuesday night’s Justice Department filing in response to the search of Mar-a-Lago for classified stolen documents, it’s safe to assume we are quickly achieving peak table pounding. In part because the Artist Formerly Known as President (there should be an unpronounceable symbol for this phrase) has burned right through his last competent attorneys, the yelling like hell has consisted mainly of posting about QAnon and 4Chan as opposed to any recognizable or coherent legal analysis.
AdvertisementOne of the principal things achieved by the 36-page filing released by the Department of Justice was to brush back claims of executive privilege or blanket declassification that had been trotted out in recent weeks to defend Donald Trump’s possession of stolen documents. Prosecutors instead indicated that Trump’s lawyers had “never asserted that the former president had declassified the documents or asserted any claim of executive privilege.” The rest of the document contends Trump and his lawyers lied to and misled federal officials, and that, perhaps most importantly, Trump “lacks standing to seek judicial relief or oversight as to presidential records because those records do not belong to him.” In other words, he cannot claim that the stolen documents belong to him, as they were stolen.
It is slightly amusing to consider that Trump and his attorneys in fact brought all of this down upon themselves with their request for a special master. The legal argument upon which he seems to have settled on today is that the FBI is bad at housekeeping and made a mess during the raid. (Marie Kondo #protip? If those classified nuclear documents don’t spark joy, it’s probably time to give them away).
It’s easy to forget that what the Artist Formerly Known as President is now ensnared by is not simply the law, but also the facts. That’s why attempts to compare what he did to what Hillary Clinton did are so fatuous. What Clinton did notparticipate in was persistent and knowing obstruction. She cooperated with authorities and testified on multiple occasions. Facts still matter, which is why waving around the text of the Espionage Act and threatening riots on the streets as if this were an apples-to-apples comparison to Clinton might make for good television, but it isn’t law.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementWe’ve become so accustomed to the great greased watermelon that is the former president it’s impossible to imagine that, after escaping the clutches of the Mueller probe, two impeachment efforts, and a hailstorm of prosecutions in New York, he might finally be good and caught. The tricks he’s used for decades to evade accountability—the high-paid lawyers, the bullying and intimidation of opposing parties and witnesses, and the presidency itself—seem to be failing him this time. As has been the case with Trump and Trumpism, the pressing issue the rest of us must grapple with isn’t so much whether the slow rolling rule of law can finally catch up with him but whether, should he be indicted and tried, the rule of mob will somehow bring down the whole house of cards with it.
AdvertisementMaybe the best evidence for the possibility that something approximating sanity lies ahead is the relative silence from the very quarters that would ordinarily be howling the loudest. The thing these folks need to explain—before they can justify Trump’s conduct in holding onto secret documents, compromising sources and methods, and then lying about it—is what he was doing with these documents, some of which were tucked into a desk drawer with his passports (i.e., he knew what they were and he knew where they were) in the first place. Until and unless Trump supporters are confident that former presidents can declassify every national security document that crosses the transom forever using nothing but their eyebrows, and then use it for whatever purposes they seek, what we are going to hear a lot of in the coming weeks is less an actual coherent defense and much more a continuation of “but her emails.”
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- Sure Sounds Like the Supreme Court Is About to Give Trump a Big Win!
- Trump Is Trying Something New With the 2024 Campaign. It’s Smart—and Terrifying.
- Trump Has Always Been a Caricature of a Particular Type of Villain. It’s on Full Display Right Now.
- The Most Alarming Answer From Trump’s Interview With Time
It’s not, then, just that the law seems finally to have caught up with Donald Trump. It’s that the facts finally have, too; the same facts Attorney General Merrick Garland had vowed to follow wherever they led. The facts here are indisputably bad for the former president, which is why he keeps trying to argue the law. Unfortunately for him, the law is also indisputably bad for him. The table pounding doesn’t seem to be amassing much traction anymore, although he and Sen. Lindsey Graham will certainly keep working the lawless and disaffected into a possibly dangerous lather. But this doesn’t feel like a movement that is ascendant and it doesn’t feel like a movement that is converting a whole ton of new adherents. New Quinnipiac polling shows that Americans, by a margin of 50 percent to 41 percent, think Trump should be prosecuted on criminal charges over his handling of classified documents, and nearly 6 in 10 think he acted inappropriately in handling those documents. That isn’t the dawning of reason, but it is a trend line.
There is still an immense amount that we don’t know. But based on what we do learn each day, this is a significant win for facts, law, and accountability. That is a good deal more than we have witnessed in a long time.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:新闻中心)
-
Cicadas love to land on people. Experts explain why.
Even on an Air Force base tarmac, a cicada landed on the president's neck. The spectacular emergence ...[详细] -
今日汉源县清溪镇1908年8月5日,威尔逊拍摄的清溪古城全貌如今的汉源县清溪镇虽只是一个乡镇,但一千多年前却是一个县城,因古城东、西有两条河,水流清澈可鉴,故名清溪。清溪古城自汉代始建,是一座郡、州、 ...[详细]
-
本报讯为有效破解基层“熟人社会”监督难题,增强县区)巡察工作质效,促进全市巡察工作水平整体提升,6月23日下午,全市县区)交叉巡察工作会召开,会议对8个县区)交叉巡察工作进行安排部署。会议指出,在县区 ...[详细]
-
中国山东网青岛11月30日讯(记者 杨广科) 2018年是改革开放40周年。40年,春风化雨,沧海桑田。40年,乘风破浪,直挂云帆。时间将非凡成就铸成光辉历史,将深刻启示照进美好未来。站在改革开放40 ...[详细]
-
A global problem is preventing the wars in Ukraine and Gaza from coming to an end.
Why do the wars in Ukraine and Gaza grind on, ferociously, relentlessly, with no end in sight and th ...[详细] -
揭晓!“寻找最美渔港”广东摄影、短视频大赛获奖名单公布_南方+_南方plus中国是一个有着14亿多人口的大国,解决好吃饭问题、保障粮食安全,要树立大食物观,既向陆地要食物,也向海洋要食物,耕海牧渔,建 ...[详细]
-
9万亿规模“零售之王”来信:要从赛道投资回归精选个股,“价值白马”有望翻身
元旦过后的A股市场,遭遇冷启动。近9万亿元规模的招商银行再度致信投资者,引起市场关注。1月11日,招商银行App发布致投资者一封信。这封信中,招行结合对政策的理解和对市场的判断,分享三点思考,细读下来 ...[详细] -
中国山东网青岛5月21日讯(记者 杨广科) 近日,故宫学院院长、中国文物学会会长单霁翔走进即墨古城大讲堂,作了题为“匠者仁心——让文化遗产资源活起来”的 ...[详细]
-
We've been using the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED exclusively as a productivity monitor for the last six m ...[详细]
-
名山区检察院禁毒宣传进社区本报讯在“6·26”国际禁毒日来临前夕,名山区检察院联合区审计局、槐溪社区居民委员会,在槐溪坝安置区共同开展禁毒法治宣传活动,倡导广大人民群众自觉远离毒品犯罪,提高识毒、防毒 ...[详细]