Facebook's Oversight Board decision about Trump is the worst case scenario for Mark Zuckerberg
At first glance, today's decision by Facebook's Oversight Board to uphold the suspension of former President Donald Trump seems like just the kind of backup Mark Zuckerberg was looking for from the "independent" body he created. But, upon closer inspection, today's ruling is pretty much a disaster for Facebook.
The Oversight Board ruled on Wednesday that it was appropriate for Facebook to have banned President Trump, following his posts supporting the pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. But they said that keeping him in the social media purgatory of "indefinite suspension" was not in keeping with the platform's existing policies.
Basically the matter now goes back to Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg to either tell Trump when the suspension will end or straight-up ban him and permanently delete his accounts.
Tweet may have been deleted
The decision to uphold Trump's suspension is obviously notable in and of itself, but the real meat of the Oversight Board's ruling comes further down in their statement. The board directs Facebook to stop arbitrarily enforcing their rules and the penalties that go along with them whenever it pleases. "Facebook cannot make up the rules as it goes, and anyone concerned about its power should be concerned about allowing this," they write.
Tweet may have been deleted
If Trump's posts on Jan. 6 violated its rules, per the board, then the company needs to make that clear and enforce these same rules for everyone — including other political leaders around the world. On top of that, the Oversight Board called out Facebook for not examining how its very own platform contributed to the events that played out at the Capitol on Jan. 6.
Tweet may have been deleted
This clearly isn't exactly what Facebook was hoping for, despite their statement that they were pleased with the decision and recommendations.
From the moment Mark Zuckerberg announced the formation of the Oversight Board three years ago, Facebook's staunchest critics have knocked the board for what it appeared to be: a PR ploy meant to shelter the social media giant from making tough decisions.
Facebook funds the Oversight Board. Facebook chooses the members on the board. Yet, this body is somehow considered independent of Facebook. It takes cases about specific content decisions made by the company on its platforms, like Facebook and Instagram, and its rulings on these specific cases are binding. However, the broad policy suggestions made by the board to Facebook are not. So this certainly doesn't mean we're about to Facebook pivot to being proactive and even-handed about content moderation in general.
In terms of the specific situation of Trump's banning, Facebook decided on Jan. 21 to send the decision to suspend Trump up to the Oversight Board, claiming the matter was too big for the company to determine on its own. In reality, Facebook was using this as a way to punt the responsibility to an outside entity specifically set up by Facebook to dissipate the heat that comes with these kinds of actions.
Facebook knowsit has a large user base of right-leaning, conservative users. If the Oversight Board plainly upheld the indefinite suspension, it could cite this "third party" as responsible for the final decision. If the board overturned the suspension and Trump was brought back to the platform, it could tell the broader public that the company's hands were now tied and they had to reinstate him due to the binding ruling.
But that plan seems, against all odds, to have backfired. Instead, the Oversight Board has, ironically, pushed the decision back to Zuckerberg.
In its decision, the Oversight Board explicitly uses Facebook's own request against the company. The board states that when the case was referred to them, "Facebook specifically requested 'observations or recommendations from the Board about suspensions when the user is a political leader.'"
Taking that into account, it seems impossible to act on the Trump case as if it was a sole content moderation decision. The Oversight Board wants Facebook to clearly outline its policies as well as the consequences of violating them so this doesn't happen again in the future.
In fact, the Oversight Board brings up Facebook's own role quite directly when telling Facebook to review its own contributions to what occurred on Jan. 6.
"This should be an open reflection on the design and policy choices that Facebook has made that may allow its platform to be abused," the Oversight Board said.
This cannot be what Facebook had in mind when it set up the Oversight Board.
Related Video: The rise of Big Tech monopolies from Microsoft to Google
(责任编辑:产品中心)
- 评论丨农事运动会:一场农民的盛会、新农人风采展现的盛会、城乡双向奔赴的盛会
- Truecaller gets payment support and Duo integration as it trickles to feature phones
- Shaheen inspires Lahore’s defence
- The Huawei Watch 2 (and Android Wear 2) have all the same smartwatch problems
- We Bought the Cheapest DDR5 RAM Modules We Could Find, Are They Any Good?
-
Is Mercury retrograde messing with you? Think again.
Mercury is a little-known, still mysterious world.But one thing is certain. Mercury, the closest pla ...[详细] -
S. Korea notes UN sanctions obligations after report on Putin's gift to NK leader
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lim Soo-suk speaks during a press briefing at the ministry building in ...[详细] -
This iconic 'Game of Thrones' actor will feature in 'Peaky Blinders' Season 4
If you are a fan of both Game of Thrones and Peaky Blinderswe have good news for you. One of the mos ...[详细] -
Koreans' overseas card spending hits record high last year
Overseas card spending by South Koreans hit a record high last year due to increased outbound travel ...[详细] -
[Graphic News] Average book price nears 20,000 won
The cost of purchasing a book in South Korea is approaching 20,000 won ($14.80), according to recent ...[详细] -
S. Korean FM Cho voices concerns over N. Korea
South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Tae-yul speaks during a United Nations Security Council meeting ah ...[详细] -
Hackers steal $4.2 million from cryptocurrency exchange Bitrue
Singaporean cryptocurrency exchange Bitrue has been hacked, with the perps making off with roughly $ ...[详细] -
最新研究!英德红茶有助于缓解II型糖尿病_南方+_南方plus随着II型糖尿病T2D)发病率的上升,茶多糖TPs)作为茶叶中分离出的生物活性化合物的抗糖尿病作用受到越来越多的关注。许多报告表明,通过口 ...[详细]
-
Webb telescope discovers 6 rogue worlds. They didn't form the way you'd expect.
Sometimes, planets go rogue. Scientists used the powerful James Webb Space Telescope to spot six of ...[详细] -
“一年之计在于春,立春啦!今年农历大年初二,公历2月4日为立春节气。”立春是一年二十四节气中的第一个节气。随着立春节气的到来,我市气温逐渐升高,立春预示着自然界万物开始复苏进入春季。春季是体质投资的最 ...[详细]
29 Dive Bars, Saloons, and Taverns Where the Vibe Is Unbeatable
How to download the iOS 13 public beta on your iPhone
- “笋货”上市采购旺!清远西牛麻竹笋迎秋季尝鲜热
- Tinder scammers fool 30 men into sending money over
- 1 dead, 1 missing after fishing boat sinks off Jeju Island
- This fake news simulator is the depressing video game America deserves
- 21 Lost and Lonely Cemeteries
- Photos show stark contrast in police response to Capitol riot vs. Black Lives Matter protests
- Washington will consider 'interim steps' toward NK denuclearization: US official