How to resist propaganda—from the Kremlin and the White House.
Two weeks ago, RT approached me for an interview. I wavered. Was there any way to go on the show without making myself a mouthpiece for Moscow? Should I just say no?
RT is the propaganda arm of the Russian regime. Financed by the Kremlin, the network acts as Vladimir Putin’s most eager cheerleader, politely declining to cover domestic repression. Its commitment to untruth is so dogged that it has also become an important breeding ground for the kind of cynical propaganda that is increasingly at the center of politics throughout the West. (On its website, RT claims that it reaches 36 million Europeans and 8 million Americans every week.) So when the network asked me to talk about my research, I immediately understood what its angle would be.
As a political scientist, I have argued that liberal democracy in countries such as the United States is much less stable than most people assume. Since the turn of the millennium, we’ve seen stagnating living standards, eroding trust in public institutions, and rising anger at the political system. Even in countries such as Sweden, where politics was once genteel and thoroughly, well, boring, far-right populists are rising rapidly. As I watched these changes over the past few years, I began to ask some unnerving questions: What if we are entering a period of real instability? Could political scientists who assumed that democracy had long since become “the only game in town” turn out to be wrong?
AdvertisementMy answer is yes. As I’ve shown in a series of articles with my colleague Roberto Stefan Foa, attitudes toward democracy have rapidly soured over the past 20 or so years. Even in the most historically stable countries in North America and Western Europe, democracy may now be deconsolidating.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementSo I knew what RT wanted. Look how bad democracy is, it would say. It’s widely despised even in countries like the United States, and here’s a political scientist to prove it.All of my instincts told me to turn down the invitation. For anybody who is serious about defending liberal democracy in these uncertain times, the first rule must be not to make yourself a witting tool of those trying to harm our institutions.
AdvertisementThen I thought about it a bit more. What if I could use my appearance on RT to speak my mind about the authoritarian alternative to democracy—and drive home just how much we have to lose back here in the United States? I emailed the producer and agreed to make the appearance on the condition that it be carried live, not tape-delayed. To my surprise, the producer quickly agreed. The game was on. I walked over to RT’s New York offices on Third Avenue and was connected to a host in Moscow. Now I just had to make sure that I didn’t choke.
“Is that really the case, then,” a slick news anchor with a cut-glass English accent asked me at the top of the segment, “that people are losing faith in democracy?”
Advertisement AdvertisementI gave a quick summary of my findings. Then I pivoted. The danger, I argued, is that a new crop of far-right populists would soon try to erode the basic institutions of liberal democracy. In a first step, they would politicize once-independent state institutions. Tax authorities would go after political opponents. Regulatory agencies would try to harm the business of political rivals. “This,” I said, “is exactly what has happened in Russia over the last 10 or 15 years, and the risk now is that similar things will start to happen in Western Europe and North America.”
AdvertisementThe host tried to cut me off. But I was determined to keep going. The second danger, I quickly added, consists of more overt forms of repression. Eventually, freedom of speech would be curtailed. Dissent would be quelled. Independent newspapers would be silenced. Government critics would be persecuted. “That again,” I said, “is exactly what has happened in Russia over the last 10 or 15 years.”
AdvertisementThen I went in for the kill. The biggest danger, I said, was that propaganda and fake news would become so pervasive that politics could no longer be about truth. In such a world, politics would become altogether divorced from the realm of facts. “That is exactly what has happened in Russia over the last 10 or 15 years,” I concluded, “and this channel, which you’ve been very gracious in inviting me to speak to, is a key element in doing that.”
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementI could tell I’d hit a nerve by the hostile reaction of the studio technician. He didn’t say a word as he took the microphone off me, but his glare was unambiguous. For an hour or two, I was in a celebratory mood.
AdvertisementThen I considered just how little I’d accomplished. For a few short minutes, the segment broke through RT’s carefully guarded wall of propaganda. But on its own, it won’t have much of an impact. The regularly scheduled programing immediately resumed. A minute or two after I had been ushered off the air, the slick presenter was once again smiling his slick smile.
AdvertisementMy little guerrilla mission was not going to bring down the Putin regime. So is there a more effective way to stand up to RT’s propaganda—and similar efforts closer to home, including the brazen lies and the scores of fake news stories that helped get Donald Trump elected?
AdvertisementTo begin with, we have to understand the scale of the challenge. We need to realize that this kind of propaganda is a deliberate—and potent—attack on liberal democracy. Stephen Colbert has excoriated “truthiness,” the willingness of politicians to say things because they feeltrue. Similarly, the Princeton philosopher Harry Frankfurt has argued that the greatest threat comes not from the lying politician but rather the politician who has grown altogether indifferent to the truth—the one who, in Frankfurt’s words, is simply “bullshitting.”
Both of these concepts are useful, yet each of them fails to capture the full scale of the new propaganda wars. Putin is not indifferent to the truth, nor does he enjoy saying things merely because they sound true. Rather, he has consciously flooded the political system with so many lies, so much bullshit, and such incessant fakery that it becomes impossible to transact politics on the basis of truth. At a certain point, so many lies pervade the system, and so few facts are generally agreed upon, that even people who are highly informed about politics can no longer get to the bottom of things. As a result, politics becomes a competition between rival realities—one in which you have little choice but to believe whatever narrative your own team puts out.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThings have not yet gotten quite this bad in the United States. Trump’s celebrity has long given him the ability to speak—and to lie—directly to the American people. But lacking control over state institutions, he hasn’t been able to create an alternate reality to the same extent as Putin has in Russia. As a result, we do not know just how far Trump is willing to go in spreading misinformation. But we may be about to find out—and the signs are not encouraging. Trump has a lot to fear from the truth, and his willingness to lie and dissemble can hardly be in doubt. As he takes control of state institutions, there is every chance that it will keep getting harder to get to the bottom of the lies, evasions, and outright conspiracy theories he and those in his circle are spreading.
AdvertisementSo what can we do? First, there is power in numbers. I’m not likely to be invited back on RT anytime soon. But if other critics of Putin join the effort to undermine his message, more cracks might begin to show. As I experienced firsthand, for any one guest, it is surprisingly easy to turn the tables on the purveyors of propaganda, if only for a brief moment. And if we are able to penetrate RT’s defenses, then there must be ways to subvert outlets spreading propaganda in the United States as well. To this end, Slatehas just launched This Is Fake, a browser extension that helps readers find and flag fake news on Facebook.
AdvertisementSecond, while we need not waste our time disproving every last conspiracy theory, however outlandish, we must be unwavering in our commitment to a politics based on the truth. One part of this is to dispense with the false neutrality that has long prevailed in American media. When two reasonable political parties make diverging yet reasonable arguments for diverging yet reasonable policies, it makes sense to treat their claims with equal respect. By contrast, when some politicians have started to invent claims at will, without bothering to produce evidence for them or to make their lies internally coherent, it is a retreat from truth-based politics to treat them as though they were equivalent. Big newspapers should beware becoming political partisans—but lest they cease serving any real function, they must become proud partisans of the truth.
Advertisement AdvertisementThird, we need to recognize that much of the function of everyday falsehoods is to cloak the importance of dangerous lies and obfuscations. So while we should call out all lies, we must take special care to chronicle the erosion of basic democratic norms, especially when they are happening in secret or when the government is out to mislead us. If the government does start down the path I described on RT, auditing opponents, using the regulatory state to punish critics, or copying Putin’s other tricks, we need to document these illiberal actions. Together with some entrepreneurial colleagues, I’m currently building a database to collect such violations by the Trump administration.
Finally, nothing counters cold propaganda quite as effectively as a mass of warm bodies in the street. Television channels can downplay the number of protesters. Leaders with an authoritarian streak can call them criminals or communists. But if a huge segment of the population comes out to protest, no amount of spin is going to conceal the public’s anger. When they come out into the streets in the hundreds of thousands, the people remain as able as ever to resist a gifted propagandist.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:行业动态)
-
13 Unbelievable Underwater Wonders in Florida
A must for any aquatic adventurer is a visit to the City of Mermaids at Weeki Wachee, which offers a ...[详细] -
在每一个考试环节,参加驾驶证考试的市民都承受着巨大的压力。每当通过一关,内心石头落地,考生便容易放松。然而,就在不久前,在市公安局交警支队车辆管理所科目二考场内,一位参加小型汽车驾驶证考试的考生在顺利 ...[详细]
-
募捐现场在第四个国家扶贫日即将到来之际,10月13日下午,市委办公室开展募捐活动,以实际行动为支持贫困群众和贫困村脱贫致富贡献力量。活动中,市委办公室干部职工现场自愿捐款5950元。捐赠款项拟用于天全 ...[详细]
-
19日晚,2017第十二届全球城市形象大使上海赛区总决赛收官,以四川雅安选手身份出赛的雅女郑璐瑶不负家乡人民厚望,表现优异,勇夺桂冠。郑璐瑶在比赛中。受访者供图)为家乡代言站在舞台,郑璐瑶身着一席粉红 ...[详细]
-
22 Unusual Things You Can Find in the Desert
In the desert, it can seem like very little exists aside from dunes and a few creatures that are ada ...[详细] -
雅安日报/北纬网讯日前,市看守所组织民警、职工开展登山比赛和户外拓展训练活动,以进一步增强队伍的凝聚力和战斗力,活跃文化生活。在登山比赛中,参赛选手你追我赶,谁也不愿落后。比赛中你帮我扶的场景时常可见 ...[详细]
-
14日至15日,由市教科所主办的2017年雅安市中小学音乐、美术教师基本功比赛在雨城区太平实验小学举行。来自全市各县区)41名选手代表跻身决赛,100余名中小学音乐、美术教师参加观摩活动。本次比赛是对 ...[详细]
-
城市环境建设如何,直接关乎百姓生活福祉。这几年来,借助灾后恢复重建等发展机遇,我市城市建设发生了翻天覆地的变化,不少人感叹:新添的公园、新引进的商场让这个城市配套设施更加齐全,市民休闲娱乐的地方更多了 ...[详细]
-
Military prosecutors indict intel official over leaking 'black agent' info
(Getty Images Bank)The defense ministry's prosecutors' office on Tuesday indicted a milita ...[详细] -
雅安日报/北纬网讯 8月18日,在2017互联网+农业论坛上,我市天全县二郎山喇叭河景区荣获“四川生态休闲旅游目的地”称号。该活动由省委农工委,省农业厅,省商务厅,省质量技术监督局,省金融工作局,四川 ...[详细]