Jordan Peterson brings the “dark web” to Aspen.
ASPEN, Colorado—The “intellectual dark web” came to the sunny slopes of Aspen on Tuesday night, when New York Times opinion editor Bari Weiss interviewed Jordan Peterson, the popular and provocative University of Toronto psychologist, who has built a best-selling brand on the idea that his ideas about gender and politics are being silenced by mainstream critics. That the conversation took place, onstage, at the Aspen Ideas Festival—about as mainstream and prestigious a venue as any professor could hope to address—did little to dampen that sense of grievance.
Caitlin Flanagan, a contributing editor at the Atlantic, set the tone with a journalist-bashing introduction. Flanagan guaranteed that media outlets will publish “at least two articles” that mischaracterize the event and promised attendees she would publish the inevitable corrections on her Twitter account Wednesday morning. (None have appeared as of this writing.)
It was a fitting introduction for a conversation between Peterson and Weiss, who have interpreted opposition to their ideas about sexism and transphobia as a silencing campaign waged by politically correct thought police. In a May column for the Times, Weiss cast Peterson as the vanguard of an “intellectual dark web”—a group of generally conservative writers, academics, and commentators who believe they’ve been chased out of mainstream intellectual debate because their brave ideas challenge social-justice orthodoxy, with a particular focus on the hazards of feminism.
Advertisement Here’s the thing about Peterson’s words: They’re big, but they don’t mean much.One might assume that sharing the stage at the Aspen festival would put that self-congratulatory grievance to rest. But at this point, it’s clear that this gripe is central to Peterson’s shtick, even when he’s on a stage, in Aspen, with one of the most visible employees of one of the most widely read newspapers in the country. At times, the conversation felt like a game of marginalized Mad Libs. Peterson said universities are “enabling activist disciplines” like women’s studies and ethnic studies, thus “allowing for the distribution of this absolutely nonsensical view that Western society is fundamentally a patriarchal tyranny, which is absurd on at least five dimensions of analysis, but is increasingly the thing you have to believe if you’re allowed to speak in public.”
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementWeiss is best known for her right-leaning takes on #MeToo, the Women’s March, and cultural appropriation, and proved a mostly kind interlocutor in conversation. Though she attempted to interrogate one of Peterson’s ideological inconsistencies—that he champions free speech while suing a university for defamation, because three employees compared him to Adolf Hitler—she mostly let him hold court and praised his ideas as “generally commonsensical.” By turns, Weiss accused the “mainstream press” of “mischaracterizing,” “manipulating,” “intentionally torquing,” and “defaming” Peterson and his words.
Here’s the thing about Peterson’s words: They’re big, but they don’t mean much. This is even more obvious in person than it is on the page. He repeats a few impressive-sounding clauses over and over again: “A priori cognitive categories” is one. Those explain, according to Peterson, why humans naturally interpret one another through the lenses of masculine, feminine, and child. “A priori ideological supposition” is another. That’s apparently a thing that blinds feminists to facts. He spends a great deal of time justifying his expertise. “My publication record puts me in the top 0.5 percent of psychologists,” he said at one point on Tuesday. “I have 10,000 citations … and 100 published papers.” Later, he suggested audience members watch one of his YouTube videos that “has 500,000 views, by the way.”
Advertisement AdvertisementFor anyone who’s spent time engaging with the “radical social constructionists” Peterson despises, his claims about feminists are familiar straw men. On Tuesday night, Peterson brought up his favorite study: the one that found that in Scandinavian countries—the most egalitarian in the world—occupations are even more segregated by gender than they are in less equitable nations. To Peterson, this is proof that biological differences between men and women are at the root of inequities like the gender wage gap. “I’m trying to look at the damn scientific literature and draw the conclusions that are necessitated by the data,” he said. He continued:
AdvertisementAdvertisementWhether or not I like a piece of data has very little bearing on whether or not I am likely to accept it … And you can say, “The whole thing is suspect because it’s the construction of the patriarchal tyrants who generated the Eurocentric scientific viewpoint.” It’s like, you wanna have that conversation, then go back to the activist disciplines and have it, because it’s not the sort of dialogue anyone sensible would engage in.
I write about women and feminism for a living, and I’ve never heard anyone make the counterargument Peterson mocked on Tuesday, which earned a hearty round of applause from the supportive crowd of mostly 55-and-ups. The more common feminist response would be something like this: Few scientists would say any conclusion is “necessitated” by a data set—every study is incomplete, and data can be interpreted in all sorts of ways. A single study about job choice in select countries cannot hope to prove that biology, not gender socialization, is the main factor behind the lack of women in STEM fields. Women in egalitarian societies are still socialized into normative gender roles, and men still exhibit sexist behavior in the workplace. One might also suspect that a country with few men in caregiving roles and few women in STEM jobs isn’t as egalitarian as other indicators suggest.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementIn a question-and-answer session, some audience members prodded at Peterson’s supposedly rigorous use of his scientific expertise. John McWhorter, a linguistics professor at Columbia University, was interested in Peterson’s idea that he can easily tell the difference between a trans person who approaches him about pronouns in a way that is “genuine and acceptable” versus “manipulative and unacceptable.”* (McWhorter also hosts the Lexicon Valley podcast for Slate.) When Weiss asked about it, Peterson invoked his profession. “First of all, I ama clinical psychologist, and I’ve talked to people for about 25,000 hours,” he said.
AdvertisementMcWhorter was more skeptical, and cited his own experience with students. “Some of them, you can tell that it’s coming from a very deep place, and they deeply need to be called they,” he said. “Some of them, my horse sense says that they’re kind of enjoying giving me a certain shock, and there’s a certain theatrical aspect … but I can’t know.” He said he always uses the pronoun they request, and asked Peterson what special psychologist skill he uses to tell a “genuine” trans person from a “manipulative” one.
AdvertisementPeterson spent several minutes evading the question, even after McWhorter asked it a few more times. “What makes you think that you’re doing the kids that are grandstanding any favors by going along with their manipulations?” Peterson finally asked. “You’re allowing, what would you call it, attention-seeking and somewhat narcissistic undergraduates to gain the upper hand over you in your class.” He said a professor can make two errors in this situation: One is that “you don’t call students what they deserve to be called.” The other is that “you call students what they want to be called even though they don’t deserve it.” Peterson said the questioner was making the second error, while he prefers to make the first. To her credit, Weiss suggested that the questioner, who appeared to be an acquaintance of hers, was “erring on the side of generosity and compassion.”
Advertisement AdvertisementWatching a hotel ballroom full of powerful people cheer and clap when a highly paid straight man calls trans college students “manipulative” is a chilling experience I hope to never repeat. But I’m glad to finally have seen Peterson speak in person, if only because his shtick is even more transparently bogus as it leaves his mouth and enters the ears of his fans. The arguments aren’t new or courageous, and despite his insistence to the contrary, they’re not based in science or the values of free speech. He is a droll message-delivery system that tells people who are uncomfortable with shifting social dynamics exactly what they want to hear.
AdvertisementPeterson’s attempt to put trans people’s very identities up for intellectual debate looks most bizarre next to the gospel of morality he preaches. He told Weiss that the motivating impulse behind his work is a desire to discover “how is it you mustconduct yourself in the world” such that, if another Hitler were to come to power, you would be part of the resistance rather than a follower of orders. Quibbling over whether trans-identified students are truly transgender seems a strange place to start.
Update, June 28, 2018: This post has been updated to identify John McWhorter as the previously unidentified man who asked a question of Peterson during the question-and-answer session.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:产品中心)
- Best smart home deals this week
- Yoon orders review of 52
- Parker seeks Club Brugge lift
- WhatsApp is working on 'view once' messages
- GPU Mining is Dead, Where are my Cheap GPUs?
- South Korea beefs up drills amid escalating NK provocations
- North Korea test
- Phone scams spread in North Korea with increased mobile phone users
- Moon hopes for North Korean leader's participation in ASEAN summit
- The Future of Tech: The Desktop PC
- Taylor Swift's 'Midnights' is making TikTok shimmer, sparking new trends
- 立足“五雅”特色优势产业 全面展示雅安现代农业发展成果
- Standout gifts for the most practical person in your life
-
Scientists detect water sloshing on Mars. There could be a lot.
A pioneering NASA robot detected over a thousand quakes on Mars. It also may have revealed a huge re ...[详细] -
Bye literally everyone: 11 best tweets from Twitter's worst week
It's been a weird week for Twitter. Elon Musk, now officially at the helm of the social platform, ca ...[详细] -
你吃的“马坝油粘米”是真的吗?真假如何辨别_南方+_南方plus一方水土涵养一方风物。在广东,地道的味道不胜枚举。香到“流油”的的马坝油粘米,便是其中之一。马坝油粘米是韶关市曲江区马坝镇传统的优质水稻 ...[详细]
-
Meta has its own version of TikTok's Discover List
Last year, TikTok put together one big list of its influencers, championing the creators that have k ...[详细] -
What to expect from Apple's September event: iPhone 16, Apple Watch 10, and more
Apple's big September event is fast approaching, bringing us all the latest gadget goodies from the ...[详细] -
Pastor released from North Korea publishes book
Pastor Lim Hyeon-soo Korea Times fileBy Do Je-hae Pastor Lim Hyeon-soo, a former prisoner in North K ...[详细] -
Bye literally everyone: 11 best tweets from Twitter's worst week
It's been a weird week for Twitter. Elon Musk, now officially at the helm of the social platform, ca ...[详细] -
South Korea: 'US, North Korea to resume dialogue soon'
Deputy national security adviser Kim Hyun-chong speaks to reporters after a closed-door meeting with ...[详细] -
Alcaraz vs. Van de Zandschulp 2024 livestream: Watch US Open for free
TL;DR:Live stream Alcaraz vs. Van de Zandschulp in the 2024 US Open for free on 9Now or TVNZ+. Acces ...[详细] -
President Yoon Suk Yeol speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the presidential office in Seoul last Tue ...[详细]
- Yoon, US Senate's armed service committee chief discuss alliance, N.K. threats
- AJK's week
- Trump positive: What happens if COVID forces Biden or Trump out of the race?
- Bol has doping suspension lifted
- Pope says England are not 'one
- President Moon's mediator role being threatened
- WhatsApp is working on 'view once' messages