Why Navalny doesn't yet pose a threat to Putin's rule.
“This is not a sentence against him, but against all of us.”
That’s how Ilya Klishin, a prominent Russian former journalist, described a Moscow court’s ruling yesterday sentencing opposition leader Alexei Navalny to prison for nearly three years. Though widely expected, it still sent shockwaves through the country’s politically engaged liberal class, drawing comparisons to the historic 2003 jailing of ex-oil tycoon Mikhail Khodorkovsky, once Vladimir Putin’s chief opponent. Hundreds of Muscovites hit the streets late Tuesday to protest the ruling, but the overwhelming presence of riot police turned downtown into a virtual gauntlet. More than 1,000 people were arrested.
The stakes have never been higher for Russia’s already badly beleaguered opposition—nor has the government’s room for compromise been narrower. “The Kremlin,” says Sam Greene, director of the Russia Institute at King’s College London, “has come to the conclusion that coercion is a better strategy for them than persuasion.”
Discontent boiled over late last month after Navalny was arrested upon his return to Russia from Germany, where he’d received treatment after a nearly fatal nerve agent poisoning Western governments, among many others, believe was ordered by the Kremlin. Further angered by Navalny’s release of a bombshell investigation into what his team claims is a billion-dollar Black Sea palace built for Putin, tens of thousands of people turned out in scores of cities across Russia over the past two weeks to decry endemic corruption and selective justice. Thousands were detained, some brutally, while Navalny’s allies promised more civil disobedience.
AdvertisementReports from the ground suggested the demonstrations were “something special,” reflecting a level of anger not seen during earlier rounds of unrest. In contrast to the occasionally sanctioned and mostly peaceful opposition rallies of 2011-2012 in Moscow (which I covered firsthand), protesters this time appeared emboldened—perhaps because nearly a decade has passed without the slightest sign of political liberalization, or because they were motivated by their peers in Belarus who’ve doggedly continued turning out against their own strongman almost six months after last year’s disputed election.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementIndeed, most agree the boldness of Navalny’s confrontation with Putin has surpassed that of any other opposition figure in Russia, while his political acumen and organizational power remain unmatched among his peers. He has inspired many young Russians fed up with the stodgy, Soviet nature of Putin’s lifetime rule and the international isolation it has brought with it.
AdvertisementYet time and again, whether during the massive rallies of nine years ago or the scattered socioeconomic protests around the country more recently, his system has persisted amid periodic spikes of discontent. Unlikely as it may seem, experts say it’s precisely these kinds of challenging moments that help the Putin regime develop its remarkable resilience. “He has built his power methodically,” said Gregory Feifer, a veteran Russia watcher and former NPR correspondent in Moscow. “He’s done it by trial and error.”
A quick look at recent history might help explain why. Consider, for example, the almost-sudden collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991: Although presaged by economic crisis and social malaise, it was largely facilitated by elites who no longer bought into the Communist system. But Putin has built a social and political structure bound by corruption at every level, says Feifer, author of Russians: The People Behind the Power, ensuring that precious few—from ordinary citizens to high-level members of his security clan—see incentives to shaking up the status quo.
Advertisement AdvertisementAt the elite level, according to democracy watchdog Freedom House, the state is “closely intertwined with powerful economic oligarchs, who benefit from government patronage in exchange for political loyalty and various forms of service.” That graft trickles all the way down to the bottom, with private businesses “routinely targeted for extortion or expropriation by law enforcement officials and organized criminal groups.” The result is a self-sustaining system built on broad societal buy-in, whether many Russians like it or not.
AdvertisementThe power of Putin’s security apparatus has also helped. Judging by their gratuitous violence against protesters in recent weeks, Russian riot police have learned from their Belarusian counterparts in using force to frighten away dissatisfied citizens (though have not yet reached the same level of brutality). While keeping Navalny locked up, especially during September’s parliamentary elections, serves a clear political purpose, it’s also demonstrative. “The goal,” wrote Russian political analyst Tatiana Stanovaya on Twitter, “is to make Navalny—and others—realize that they face the prospect of spending the rest of their lives behind bars.”
AdvertisementNavalny’s imprisonment is undoubtedly a test for Russia’s opposition. On one hand, Greene says, his movement has built a disciplined grassroots network that may well continue humming along even with its leader behind bars. On the other, the authorities likely won’t shy away from continuing to harass activists or locking them up. But the current moment may also be deeply revealing for the countless ordinary Russians who, despite their possible distaste for Putin’s crude autocracy, have stayed politically uninvolved or otherwise silent over the years.
Advertisement AdvertisementThen there’s the ardent base the Russian leader cultivated by stoking a culture war pitting a solid nationalist-minded majority against an increasingly marginalized and insular liberal class. Feifer, who followed Putin’s rise in Russia as a fellow for the Institute of Current World Affairs (where he is now the executive director and where I work as an editor) highlights the important role societal elites played in either tolerating or enabling Putin at the outset. Back then, in the early 2000s, many prominent cultural and political figures rallied around the gray former KGB operative and reveled in his promise to lift Russia from what he characterized as the ruin of the 1990s—a refrain he regularly raises today.
Advertisement AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- The Meltdown in Michigan Says It All About Where MAGA Is Headed
- Stormy Daniels’ Turn as a Witness Brings Home What This Trial Is About
- Donald Trump’s Lawyer Helped Make Alvin Bragg’s Case for Him
- Donald Trump Really Did This to Himself
Dampened by years of street rallies, online chatter and muckraking journalism, some of his shine has since worn off. But however inspiring Navalny’s movement may have been in recent years, it’s still far from convincing enough Russians to divest from a rigid system they’ve known for at least two decades. That’s not to say the system is unbreakable; the catastrophic lack of public investment and economic diversification, as well as increasing isolation on the world stage, means it is almost certainly unsustainable. But although the lack of public mandate also makes Putin’s rule brittle, there are few signs that reform or collapse is imminent.
AdvertisementLike many of his peers, Klishin, a former editor at Russia’s only independent TV station, is wondering how long he’ll need to wait before figures like Navalny are allowed to play a meaningful role in his country’s political life. “Even worse,” he told me the morning after the ruling, “Russia’s current rulers have kids.”
As the repression continues, he adds that it amounts to “a wake-up call addressed to the silent majority”—who may find it increasingly difficult to bury their heads in the sand. “You are either against unmotivated police brutality, unjust pseudo-justice and repression,” he says, “or you support it.” But how many Russians will begin asking themselves that question?
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:行业动态)
- 11 Telescopes Exploring The Magic of Space
- 琚笘鐣岄《灏栧疄楠屽寮曞叆锛佹捣淇″尰鐤椾骇鍝佸皢娣卞害铻嶅悎杈捐姮濂囨満鍣ㄤ汉
- 8天长假 青岛的吃货们都藏在哪?黄岛区外卖订单总量位居青岛第一
- 青岛有58人荣登中国好人榜 获赠《中国好人传》
- Is Mercury retrograde messing with you? Think again.
- Supercritical geothermal power: Limitless promise or impossible dream?
- 授课5011人次!性教育走进信宜市乡镇课堂
- 2016鏃惰鍛ㄦ槑澶╁紑骞 鏈湡璁捐甯堝皢鎼烘柊鍝佷寒鐩竉涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- 缇庢櫙鐘瑰鐢讳腑鏉 鐢荤瑪涓嬬殑鑰侀潚宀涜浜哄鐥村閱塤涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
- Klarna CEO reveals plan to reduce workforce by 50% and replace it with AI
- 交通银行青岛分行开展 “金融联合宣传教育活动”
- “双11”带货争锋“猫狗狮拼”明枪暗战
- 周末来“冬趣崂山”文旅商贸惠民市集,消费一元便可抽奖
-
Gastro Obscura's Guide to Where to Eat in Nashville
Every month, thousands of bachelorette parties don their TEAM BRIDE sashes and descend on Nashville. ...[详细] -
中国山东网11月10日讯激荡15年,回忆创业初始的征程,依旧振奋人心。创立伊始的百洋以出色的品牌运营能力立足,其孵化的进口钙品牌迪巧、化学消化不良品牌泌特、逆转肝纤维化品牌扶正化瘀,在各自细分赛道上斩 ...[详细]
-
本报讯“感谢宝兴法院为企业排忧解难,保障了企业的合法权益。”近日,宝兴县某公司的员工将一面印有“执法公正一身正气,为企解忧铭记于心”的锦旗送到办案法官手中,以此表达对宝兴县人民法院工作的赞扬和谢意。宝 ...[详细]
-
雅安经开区智能制造产业园中国·雅安大数据产业园ECC指挥中心,工作人员监测数据运行情况大数据时代,抢先机,促发展。2021年,雅安经济技术开发区以下简称:雅安经开区)围绕“加快建设成渝地区大数据产业基 ...[详细]
-
25 Years Later: A Brief Analysis of GPU Processing Efficiency
The first 3D graphics cards appeared 25 years ago and since then their power and complexity have gro ...[详细] -
11月12日,青岛市第二届数字城管岗位技能竞赛活动举行,来自10个区(市)的50名信息采集员、20名受理派遣员参加。本次竞赛由青岛市总工会和青岛市城管局联合举办,分为受理派遣员上机竞赛、采集员现场竞赛 ...[详细]
-
华人指挥家陈同(左)与大提琴演奏家聂佳鹏10日下午,青岛新闻网记者从青岛交响乐团了解到,青岛交响乐团本周六19:30将在青岛市人民会堂举办“法兰西之音” 交响音乐会。音乐会将邀 ...[详细]
-
中国山东网9月27日讯在“新基建”驱动数字经济热潮中,智慧园区作为重要载体,是经济发展的核心抓手,也是构建万物互联的智能世界的落脚点。为加速物联网、云计算、大数据等新一代信息技 ...[详细]
-
10 Places to Get to Know Paul Bunyan
Paul Bunyan, a larger-than-life lumberjack with super-human strength, was a character created by Can ...[详细] -
榛勬檽鏄庤拷鍔?00涓囨晳鐏剧墿璧勬俯鏆栫伨鍖篲涓浗灞变笢缃慱闈掑矝
銆€銆€鑷崡鏂归伃閬囩壒澶ф椽娑濈伨瀹充互鏉ワ紝榛勬檽鏄庡氨涓€鐩村績绯荤伨鍖猴紝缁у拰Angelababy涓€璧锋崘宀€100涓囩幇閲戝悗锛岄粍鏅撴槑鍙堟惡鎵嬬埍蹇冧紒涓氭崘鍑轰环鍊?00涓囩墿璧 ...[详细]