The Supreme Court should take up the case against Texas’ mail
In Texas and a number of other states, voters age 65 and older have the right to vote by mail for any reason, while younger voters generally have to cast ballots in person. As a result, it is harder than it should be for millions of voters to cast a ballot, solely because of their age. Cascino v. Nelson, the case challenging Texas’ second-class treatment of younger voters, is one of the most important voting rights cases before the courts, yet it has flown under the radar. Next month, the Supreme Court will consider whether to add it to its docket.
In Cascino, the plaintiffs urge the Supreme Court to strike down Texas’ discriminatory law as a violation of the 26thAmendment’s guarantee that the “right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.” SCOTUS has never interpreted the meaning of the amendment, which was ratified more than half a century ago.
This is exactly the kind of case the court should hear—particularly for the justices who insist that a judge’s duty is to enforce the Constitution’s text and history. Cascinoinvolves a key part of the Constitution that has never been given a comprehensive construction, a blatant denial of equal voting opportunities to millions of citizens, and a powerful originalist argument for vindicating the constitutional promise of an inclusive democracy. The case gives the Supreme Court the opportunity to make clear that the 26thAmendment means what it says: Laws that make it harder for younger citizens to exercise their fundamental right to vote violate the amendment’s promise of voting equality.
AdvertisementAs its text and history make clear, the 26thAmendment forbids state-sponsored voting discrimination against younger citizens. As many young Americans were being sent off to fight in Vietnam, the American people insisted that the young adults who were old enough to fight in a war were old enough to vote for the government officials who would send them to that war. In other words, they were entitled to participate in our democracy as equals.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementTo effectuate this design, the text of the 26thAmendment establishes a broad constitutional prohibition on all forms of voting discrimination against adult voters on account of age. Rather than merely lower the voting age to 18, the authors of the amendment demanded a broad constitutional rule of voting equality by proscribing governmental denial and abridgment of the right to vote on account of age. A first-time voter who has just turned 18 must be treated the same as the oldest members of the electorate. Together, the constitutional ban on age-based denial and abridgment of the right to vote established “a plenary right on citizens 18 years of age or older to participate in the political process, free of discrimination on account of age,” as the report of the House Judiciary Committee described the amendment.
AdvertisementThe Framers of the 26thAmendment consciously wrote it to parallel the Constitution’s separate prohibitions on racial and gender discrimination in voting contained in the 15thand 19thamendments, respectively. Transcending partisan divisions, Democrats and Republicans agreed that discrimination against younger voters had no place in our democracy. As Rep. Richard Poff, a Republican congressman from Virginia, insisted: “Just as the 15thamendment prohibits racial discrimination in voting and just as the 19thamendment prohibits sex discrimination in voting, the proposed amendment would prohibit age discrimination in voting.” In short, these three amendments prohibit all voting discrimination on account of the protected characteristic—race, sex, or age—without exception.
Related From Slate
Mary Ziegler
The Fight Against Birth Control Is Already Here
Read MoreIf a state sought to confer the right to vote by mail solely on white persons or men, it would be quickly struck down as a stark violation of the 15thand 19thamendments. Under the 26thAmendment, age discrimination in voting is equally suspect. The amendment forbids laws that classify voters on account of age and deny equal voting opportunities to younger voters. Texas’ two-tiered voting system is precisely what the 26thAmendment forbids.
Advertisement AdvertisementWhat does Texas say in defense of its discriminatory regime? Its main justification is that the right to vote does not include the right to vote by mail. But nothing in the text of the 26thAmendment—like that of the 15thAmendment and other voting rights amendments—carves out voting by mail from its coverage and permits blatantly discriminatory voting laws. Having chosen to allow voting by mail, Texas cannot discriminate against voters on the basis of age and deny them the right to cast mail-in ballots. Younger voters, no less than voters 65 and older, are entitled to exercise their fundamental right to vote without having to endure countless hours of waiting at a crowded polling place.
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- The Lawyer Defending Idaho’s Abortion Ban Irritated the One Justice He Needed on His Side
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- You Don’t Want to Know How It’s Going Between Trump’s Lawyers and the Judge Presiding Over His Criminal Case
- Prosecutors Are Finally Revealing Their Strategy Against Trump
Vindicating the text and history of the 26thAmendment in Cascinois important in its own right. It can also help redress one of the pathologies of our democracy: long waiting lines at the polls. This problem, fueled in part by polling place closures, has been particularly pronounced in communities of color. In 2020, for example, voters at Texas Southern University, a historically Black college in Houston, had to endure waiting times as lengthy as seven hours in order to exercise their fundamental right to vote. In Texas and elsewhere, long waiting in lines disrupts the electoral process, discourages voter participation, and ends up disenfranchising those wishing to cast a ballot. A constitutionally faithful reading of the 26thAmendment can help ensure that all voters, regardless of age, take advantage of the opportunity to vote by mail and avoid the crushingly long lines many Texans have experienced in recent elections.
The justices on the conservative-dominated Supreme Court repeatedly insist that they take text and history seriously. Cascinooffers them an opportunity to make good on that claim. The court should take up Cascino and enforce the promise of voting equality enshrined in the text and history of the 26thAmendment.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:行业动态)
- Which iPad Model Is Right for You?
- 9 Places to Experience the Turmoil of the French Revolution
- 9 Radio Telescopes Probing Space's Deepest Mysteries
- Apple is giving iMessage a massive security update
- Which is Faster for Gaming, Windows 10 or Windows 11?
- Pragmocracy Now
- Xiaomi teases its super
- Hubble spots Betelgeuse recovering after star's colossal blast
- The Ultimate Guide to Stunning, Surprising, or Hidden Filming Locations
- Number of COVID
- Best speaker deal: The Soundcore Anker Motion Boom speaker is under $75 at Amazon
- Swiatek puts past Doha titles to the back of her mind
- Victims lured into North Korea by lies welcome Japan court’s ruling against regime
-
Update your BIOS: Utilities from Top Motherboard Makers
PSA:Enthusiasts building their own PCs are accustomed to keeping up with latest drivers, especially ...[详细] -
DOHA:Qatar's Asian Cup final hero Akram Afif said "the team and people were behind me" ...[详细]
-
提高职工肺结核防治意识,广东援疆驻三师工作队开展宣讲活动_南方+_南方plus3月25日是第29个“世界防治结核病日”,广东援疆驻三师工作队“粤医相伴”健康宣讲团到第三师49团13连开展“你我共同努力 ...[详细]
-
Sad Pacquiao accepts his Olympic dream is over
MANILA:A "saddened and disappointed" Manny Pacquiao conceded Monday his Olympic boxing dre ...[详细] -
NYT mini crossword answers for August 29
The Mini is a bite-sized version of The New York Times' revered daily crossword. While the crossword ...[详细] -
New Haas boss addressing 'elephants in the room', says Magnussen
LONDON:Danish driver Kevin Magnussen said he is excited to see real change at Haas after Japanese en ...[详细] -
Hubble spots Betelgeuse recovering after star's colossal blast
Just like the mischievous Tim Burton character of the same name, the red supergiant star Betelgeuse' ...[详细] -
Victims lured into North Korea by lies welcome Japan court’s ruling against regime
People on ships bound for North Korea wave to a crowd gathered at Niigata port in Japan, in this Dec ...[详细] -
TL;DR:Secure access to your favorite free porn sites with a VPN. The best service for unblocking por ...[详细]
-
Betavolt says its diamond nuclear battery can power devices for 50 years
China's Betavolt New Energy Technology has unveiled a new modular nuclear battery that uses a combin ...[详细]
This shark lives for centuries. Scientists discover how it resists aging.
Iraqi social media influencer Um Fahad shot dead by motorbike gunman in Baghdad
- The OLED Burn
- What Peter Beinart thinks about Israel and what comes next.
- New Adobe 'AI Assistant' will summarize PDFs for you
- I spent a week using AI tools in my daily life. Here's how it went.
- The local version of Project 2025 is already causing devastation.
- Aiming for Atoms: The Art of Making Chips Smaller
- 春风化雨润心田 文明新风遍雅州