Coronavirus: what Sen. Richard Burr allegedly did with his stocks.
The allegations against Sen. Richard Burr, who until last week was chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, go something like this: While he was telling his constituents that the U.S. response to this novel coronavirus was under control, he was actually selling more than a million dollars’ worth of stock. This was back in February, when most Americans were still going to work or riding trains and buses. Burr is under suspicion for insider trading because around the time he cashed out that stock, he was saying remarkably different things about the coronavirus in public and in private: He co-wrote an op-ed for Fox News saying that the Trump administration’s coronavirus response was going smoothly, but a few weeks later, privately speaking to donors and lobbyists, he warned that the coronavirus threat was serious.
Tim Mak, NPR’s Washington investigative correspondent, was one of the first reporters on this story. On Monday’s episode of What Next, I spoke with Mak about the secret audio recording he unearthed that helped launch this investigation—and how much trouble Burr is reallyin.
Mary Harris: What are the challenges of investigating a senator like this? I imagine proving insider trading here would be difficult.As chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the briefings Burr got about the coronavirus may have been confidential. So it’s hard to know what did he know, who can know what he knew, and how that might have changed his mind about where to move his money.
Advertisement “Burr never warned the public of his view on this, despite his expertise on biological threats.” — Tim MakTim Mak:That’s true. But there are ways for investigators to get around that issue. For example, his communications with his family and broker are not classified. They can be obtained by investigators.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementI don’t think there was an expectation that this would balloon in this way. There was no telling at the beginning of this that it would become what is essentially a criminal investigation.
Part of the reason Burr’s stock sales seem suspicious is the context in which we learned about them. You uncovered this audio of him from Feb. 27. Where’s it from? What’s happening?
In order to understand that audio, we have to put ourselves back in the mindset of what the world was like in February, this pre–coronavirus crisis era: The stock market had not crashed. We hadn’t done all these stay-at-home orders. The first person had not died in the U.S. from the virus. But on Feb. 27, Burr went to a luncheon with a group of well-connected constituents. These are business leaders in North Carolina who have lobbying firms representing them in D.C. At the luncheon, Burr says he’s worried that the coronavirus crisis will possibly become as bad as the 1918 flu pandemic.
AdvertisementAt the time, I don’t think people were making that comparison as much.
He seemed to really have dug into this question of what the coronavirus crisis would mean for America. And he seemed to have some sort of information about how bad it would be. He warned about schools shutting down. He warned about travel being shut down. He warned that military hospitals would need to be set up in order to create beds and provide treatment to people who were sick.
AdvertisementAll of these things, before most of the public had any inkling that this would happen. Burr never warned the public of his view on this, despite his expertise on biological threats. He never decided to put out a press release, go to a television camera, go to any of the reporters’ mics. He warned this private group of individuals, and that was pretty much it.
Advertisement AdvertisementAnd a few weeks earlier, he’d co-written an op-ed for Fox News in which he basically said, You’re in great hands, the Trump administration is going to handle this coronavirus well. Then as soon as you reported that private meeting, other information started to come out about Burr’s stock trades.
There’s this legislation called the STOCK Act. It requires lawmakers to periodically disclose their stock transactions. ProPublica went through Burr’s stock transactions and realized something that I hadn’t, which is that Burr, on Feb. 13, made 33 stock transactions and sold up to $1.7 million worth of stock in a single day. And that’s just a few days after that op-ed.
AdvertisementHow big a deal is $1.7 million worth of stock for someone like Burr?
Advertisement AdvertisementFor a senator and for someone of his age, his net worth is not particularly high compared with that of his colleagues. So this would represent a substantial portion of his assets. Remember, he has said that he’s not going to run for reelection when his term ends in 2022. So he’s presumably thinking about retirement, and he makes a move here, it appears, to secure his future.
At NPR, you teamed up with Dartmouth College to analyze Burr’s transactions. You looked at Burr’s stock sales on Feb. 13 to see how they compared with trades he’d made in the past.
AdvertisementBetween 2012 to about 2019, Burr is a very bad stock picker. On average, if you look at his stocks six months after he purchases them, they’re down about 0.8 percent relative to other stocks in the same industry. And after a year, they’re typically down about 6 percent compared with that same benchmark.
AdvertisementHe is kind of lousy about stock picks. He doesn’t trade in high frequencies. In a quarter he would probably make an average of 3.2 stock sales. But on Feb. 13, he made more than 30 stock sales. On a single day he does 10 times what he would normally do in a quarter. And not only that, these stock sales are amazing: incredibly well-timed, incredibly well-chosen. After they were sold, they underperformed the market by 8 percent. That means those stocks performed worse than comparable ones in that same sector between the sale and the end of March.
Advertisement AdvertisementYou wrote to the senator’s spokesperson to comment on these stocks and she wrote back, “lol.”
That’s correct. That happened. I can’t speculate why she would do that.
How does the senator defend himself and explain the stock sales?
The defense for an allegation of insider trading is to say, I didn’t use nonpublic information, I only relied on public information, information that you or I or anyone else would have. So his argument is that he made these very well-timed, precise, successful sales based only on CNBC reporting on the coronavirus.
We should say that this opened up interest in other lawmakers and how they were dealing with their own stocks. But it seems like Burr’s case is different. I wonder if you can articulate why.
AdvertisementThere are a number of reasons why his transactions are more suspicious than those of some of the other names we’ve heard, like Sens. Kelly Loeffler of Georgia and Dianne Feinstein of California. He had this enormous number of transactions in a single day. And that volume of transactions was very unusual for him. He sold a lot of stocks, up to $250,000 worth, in the hospitality sector, which, as we know, has really been hit by the coronavirus crisis. His private comments show that his personal view contradicted his public view, and his statement in response to some of this reporting showed that he personally directed the sales. Loeffler, for example, has said that she used a third party and didn’t personally direct any of her sales. So if you look at the totality of those circumstances, you realize Burr’s are far more suspicious than the others.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementBurr is no longer the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee for the time being. Can you talk about the significance of that?
Burr has been a mainstay. If you talk to Democrats on the committee, you’ll find that many of them have a lot of respect for Burr and that he’s worked in a generally bipartisan way when it comes to matters of intelligence. In fact, since the 2016 election and the fallout in 2017, he’s been working across the aisle on a series of reports on Russian interference in the 2016 election and afterward. As chairman, Burr has not been super public or particularly accessible to the press. But I think, generally speaking, a lot of folks have praise for the work he’s done.
AdvertisementI was surprised to see this investigation move forward against a Republican senator. I’m curious if you can tease out the decision-making here, because there has been speculation about why it’s been Burr, since he was among the more bipartisan senators and was looking into Russian interference in the election. I wonder if you think that speculation is fair.
I think the answer to the question really depends on whether you think the Justice Department maintains its independence in the William Barr era: if the attorney general is working as the attorney general of the United States or as the president’s attorney general. If you think the DOJ has become hopelessly politicized, then you might have a fair question to raise about whether Burr was targeted here. You look at the history: Those close to the Trump White House are not fans of Burr because, as part of the Russia investigation, he helped approve a subpoena of Donald Trump Jr. to bring him before the committee. That was a surprising move by Burr that angered a lot of folks in the Trump orbit. Now, if you think the DOJ maintains a level of independence, you can look at the evidence and see that there’s a fair amount to suggest wrongdoing and to investigate.
Advertisement AdvertisementI wonder if you can talk a bit about how news organizations handled the story, because it looked different if you went over to Fox News instead of NPR.
Recently in Politics
- What You’re Not Seeing From the Darién Gap
- Congress’ Perpetual Coup Machine Is Merely Resting
- The Story About a Worm Eating RFK Jr.’s Brain Is Not As Funny As It Sounds
- I Read the Embattled Columbia President’s Old Book About What We Owe Each Other. It’s … Not Good.
I don’t think you can understate the influence of Fox News commentary on prime time. What was remarkable to me was how quickly Tucker Carlson turned on Burr and targeted him regarding these trades. It kind of set the tone for the conservative response to this scandal—no one was lining up to defend Burr at any point. In fact, Carlson explicitly asked for Burr to resign, a remarkable demand from a Fox News host to a sitting Republican senator. That was a very important moment that I think set the tone for how folks on the right would respond to this.
AdvertisementI guess Burr’s defense could be, The insider information I was getting as the intel chair wasn’t that the hotel industry is going to tank—and yet he sold a lot of hospitality stock.
You don’t need to have specific information that says Marriott is going to go down. It just needs to be material and nonpublic, meaning that if you or I as a stock buyer or seller were to have that information, it would be meaningful. So if he’d received—for example, I’m not saying that he did—a briefing that outlined the number of deaths or cases of the coronavirus that were to come to America, that would have been nonpublic information. And if he’d made transactions based on that information, there is a real possibility he could be charged with insider trading.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:新闻中心)
- 21 Unexpected Wonders in Colorado’s Vibrant Cities and Small Towns
- YouTuber 'reviews' Samsung's upcoming Galaxy S21+ like it's no big deal
- U.K. court rules Boris Johnson’s suspension of Parliament unlawful.
- Stars pay tribute to 'Ghostbusters' director Ivan Reitman
- Get Thee to Totality: Chicago
- 13 Places to Find Little Legends and Compact Cryptids
- 6 privacy apps for iOS and Android you should download now
- 10 best free movies included with Amazon Prime Video
- The attack on a Saudi oil facility might not lead to full
- 21 Unexpected Wonders in Colorado’s Vibrant Cities and Small Towns
- The attack on a Saudi oil facility might not lead to full
- Parler transfers domain name to Epik, domain registrar of choice for the far right
- 'Worldle' and 'Globle' are 'Wordle' with maps
-
21 College and University Museums
University campuses have no shortage of knowledge—from eclectic libraries filled to the brim with ra ...[详细] -
白雪中的神木垒。高华康/摄“天设地生,胜似蓬壶仙境”。对雅安之赞誉,诚不过明代杨慎此语。以至于蒙顶祖茶,熊猫老家,茶马故道;以至于丝绸之路,大渡之河,夹金之山;以至于娲皇之梦,上里之迹,牛背之影……古 ...[详细]
-
粤新采购达成意向超5000万斤!“疆品南下 粤品北上”产地行活动创佳绩
粤新采购达成意向超5000万斤!“疆品南下 粤品北上”产地行活动创佳绩_南方+_南方plus最近,“瓜果之乡”新疆喀什人气高涨。“疆品南下 粤品北上”特色农产品产地行活动在喀什地区启动,来自全国多地的 ...[详细] -
Ten Sri Lankans vanish from Commonwealth Games: official
Ten members of crisis-hit Sri Lanka's Commonwealth Games contingent in Birmingham have disappear ...[详细] -
改造提升后的景观节点本报讯8月23日,记者再次来到芦山县飞仙关4A级景区旅游基础设施建设项目施工现场,与两个月前相比,这里的变化十分明显。芦山县飞仙关4A级景区旅游基础设施建设项目共有两个标段,建设内 ...[详细]
-
YouTube removes Trump's latest video, blocks channel from posting for seven days
It's been a bad week for President Donald Trump's socials. First he was unceremoniously dumped by hi ...[详细] -
隆冬时节,名山区蒙阳街道上瓦村寒风瑟瑟。1月9日,天还未亮,上瓦村9组村民范富荣就抱着一捆青草向兔舍走去。“这小红眼瞪得圆溜溜的,一看就是饿了。”看着一只只等待喂食的兔子,范富荣心里很高兴。在100多 ...[详细]
-
Stars pay tribute to 'Ghostbusters' director Ivan Reitman
Ivan Reitman, the producer and director best known for his work on the Ghostbustersfranchise, has di ...[详细] -
Malan retires from international cricket
LONDON:Dawid Malan retired from international cricket on Wednesday, with the batsman saying his Engl ...[详细] -
I'm over lifestyle influencers
If you've ever watched a daily vlog, a package unboxing, or a clothing haul on YouTube, you may unde ...[详细]
- Courting Disaster
- 石棉县法院:成功执结追索劳动报酬系列案 让27名农民工安心过年
- North Carolina court strikes down Republicans’ partisan gerrymander.
- Korea to trial state sick pay scheme
- Courting Disaster
- Twitter confirms Trump's ban is permanent, even if he runs again in 2024
- Kris Kobach emails with ICE show effort to identify undocumented in Fremont, Nebraska.