SCOTUS: The courts implementing Project 2025, without Trump.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court refused to allow a new rule issued by the Department of Education to go into effect and protect trans students under Title IX, which promises equality in education and specifically forbids discrimination “on the basis of sex.” In 2020 the court famously decided, in Bostock v. Clayton County,that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex.” The new rule, which is for now blocked from taking effect, has sought to apply this logical conclusion to Title IX’s demand for equality.
However, since the release of Bostock, two central things have changed: the court’s structure and the prospect of former President Donald Trump’s reelection. These developments have inspired a concerted attempt on the right side of the political map to roll back Bostock, and a detailed plan to that effect was included in Project 2025, the 922-page document detailing the blueprint for a Trump administration. Yet, as this month’s decision demonstrates, the groups behind Project 2025 are already executing their plan through the courts in 2024.
Project 2025 directly targets Bostock, arguing that the ruling should not apply to various protections of equality outside its immediate circumstances. “The New Administration,” it states, “should restrict Bostock’s application of sex discrimination protections to sexual orientation and transgender status in the context of hiring and firing.” It further declares that “the President should direct agencies to withdraw unlawful ‘notices’ and ‘guidances’ purporting to apply Bostock’s reasoning broadly outside hiring and firing” and “rescind regulations interpreting sex discrimination provisions as prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, transgender status, sex characteristics, etc.” Without waiting for November’s election, the leaders of Project 2025 are already in courts, rehearsing this part of their playbook in a multifront war against Bostock and LGBTQ+ students, patients, and employees.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementRelated From Slate
Shirin Ali
The Trump Hush Money Trial Judge Is Getting Pretty Tired of This
Read MoreTake the court’s recent 5–4 decision, for example. With the exception of Justice Neil Gorsuch, who penned Bostock, all the other conservative justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts, who joined Gorsuch in Bostock, affirmed the blocking of the entire Title IX rule by district courts in Louisiana and Kentucky. This latest ruling is the culmination of a line of cases in which red states and conservative advocacy groups, like the Alliance Defending Freedom, argue that because Bostockwas decided under Title VII to protect employees, it cannot be used to protect LGBTQ+ students under Title IX.
In a similar battlefield focused on health care, red states have attacked Bostock to prevent its reasoning from protecting trans minors’ access to treatments that are available to cisgender adolescents. When the minors, their parents, and supportive doctors sought preliminary injunctions against bans on gender-affirming care, they temporarily won in many district courts that found that the bans were likely unconstitutional by applying Bostock to the equal protection clause’s broad prohibition on discrimination. However, a conservative majority of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6thCircuit lifted those injunctions, holding that Bostockdoes not apply outside Title VII and thus is “irrelevant” to the interpretation of the equal protection clause. The case, L.W. v. Skrmetti, was recently taken up by the Supreme Court and will be heard in its 2024–25 term, probably before any new administration is in place.
Advertisement AdvertisementLikewise, still in the health care trenches, lawsuits have been filed to prevent another of the Biden administration’s rules protecting LGBTQ+ people from going into effect. This rule was set by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under the nondiscrimination provision of the Affordable Care Act, demanding—based on Bostock—that medical providers avoid discriminating against LGBTQ+ patients. In response, the ADF, which is one of the chief groups behind Project 2025, launched litigation to block the rule, recently winning nationwide and statewide preliminary injunctions issued on the same day by Mississippi and Florida courts. Again, the prevailing argument was that Bostock had no life outside Title VII.
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- Kamala Harris May Finally Be the Opponent That Makes Donald Trump Fully Lose It
- So Is Donald Trump Jr. Cursed, or What?
- A Global Problem Is Preventing the Wars in Ukraine and Gaza From Coming to an End
- The Trump and Harris Campaigns Are Pivoting to a New Skirmish
Remarkably, a wave of litigation is now rising to castrate Bostock even within Title VII. In this battleground, Project 2025’s exact words matter, and employers are now arguing that they, too, can discriminate as long as they not do that in the narrow context of “hiring and firing.” For example, in Texas, the group leading Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation, attacks (in the courtroom of a far-right judge) Bostock-based guidance to employers by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Similarly, the ADF represents a group called the Christian Employers Alliance, arguing at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9thCircuit that they are allowed to deny employees health care coverage based on their gender identity because deprivation of needed gender-affirming care falls outside “hiring and firing.” And earlier this month, the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11thCircuit agreed to vacate and reconsider en banc its former 2–1 decision that applied Bostock and held that an employer who prevented such care to a transgender employee engaged in unlawful discrimination.
Although candidates on the campaign trail debate the future impact of Project 2025, much of the damage it orders is already happening in a war in the courts that seeks to hollow Bostock of any meaning.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:资讯)
- Webb telescope just snapped image of huge black hole gobbling material
- Why I hate the new Instagram Stories camera
- 'Work from home vulnerable to North Korea's cyberattackes'
- Paris residents are pissed over rather public eco
- [LLG] When compassion meets law: Lawyer defends goats, dogs, other helpless animals
- What to expect when a tech bubble bursts
- Military trivialized sexual assault complaint, despite evidence
- Gmail mistakenly sends 'New Device Sign In' messages to users
- 强降雨致我市8599人受灾
- It's Unnecessary But, AMD Is Basically Lying About CPU Performance
- 强降雨致我市8599人受灾
- The bizarre reason why several Facebook Groups just changed their privacy settings
- Texas governor gets ripped for tweeting fake Winston Churchill quote
-
29 Dive Bars, Saloons, and Taverns Where the Vibe Is Unbeatable
From hand-sculpted ice spheres to baroque cocktails made with everything from olive oil–washed gin t ...[详细] -
Facebook data reportedly helps companies guess your credit score
Facebook may know even more about your personal life than you think.Some advertisers are able to use ...[详细] -
Why I hate the new Instagram Stories camera
UPDATE: June 10, 2019, 2:06 p.m. EDT The latest update (version 97.0) for Instagram on iOS has fixed ...[详细] -
Houston school shooting: at least 10 dead, suspect detained.
At least 10 people have been killed in a shooting at Santa Fe High School south of Houston, reports ...[详细] -
24 of the Oldest Trees in the World
These trees have remained firmly rooted for centuries, in some cases millennia. The oldest among the ...[详细] -
Apple, Google ban GPS data collection for COVID
Apple and Google will reportedly ban location tracking in apps that use their proprietary COVID-19 c ...[详细] -
Cheong Wa Dae under fire for appointing student as senior official
Park Seong-min (Yonhap)Cheong Wa Dae’s recent pick of a 24-year-old college student as a senior offi ...[详细] -
5 essential things to know before Netflix’s ‘The Witcher’ premieres
Netflix is looking to fill that Game of Thrones-sized hole in your fantasy-loving heart later this w ...[详细] -
Kamala Harris’ ridiculous problem with the political press.
Last Thursday, standing on the tarmac in Michigan in front of Air Force Two, Kamala Harris took some ...[详细] -
雅安日报/北纬网讯日前,市中级人民法院对全市基层法院开展家事审判方式和工作机制改革情况进行调研,分析试点工作开展情况,结合目前存在问题对下一步工作进行安排部署。在下一步工作中,全市法院将认真落实家事审 ...[详细]