Ziglar v. Abbasi, Hernandez v. Mesa, and accountability at the border.
One need not look far these days to find agents of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the news—from the frontlines of the Trump administration’s controversial “zero tolerance” policy along the U.S.-Mexico border to citizenship checkpoints along I-95 in northern Maine. Now more than ever, ensuring that CBP agents are held accountable if and when they violate individuals’ constitutional rights seems like an obvious imperative.
In March, however, the 5thU.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appeals court with jurisdiction over Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) held that, even if a CBP agent at the U.S.-Mexico border commits what one judge described as a “cold-blooded murder,” the victim’s family cannot sue him for damages. Among other things, the court of appeals concluded in Hernández v. Mesathat federal judges generally should not provide such relief in cases presenting any kind of “national security” or “foreign policy” concerns. In the process, the 5thCircuit implied that damages will neverbe available against CBP officers even for egregious violations of clearly established constitutional rights, and it did so at an especially inauspicious time to remove even the specter of deterrence from officers of the nation’s largest law enforcement agency.
For plaintiffs like Hernández’s parents, the alternative to judge-made damages is, well, nothing.The Hernández case (in which I am co-counsel to the plaintiffs) started with the fatal shooting, on June 7, 2010, of Sergio Adrián Hernández Güereca, a 15-year-old Mexican national who, according to his parents’ lawsuit, was playing with friends in the culvert along the U.S.-Mexico border outside El Paso (and was unarmed) when Jesus Mesa, a CBP agent, shot and killed him. Hernández’s parents brought a wrongful death action against Mesa, claiming, among other things, that the shooting was in violation of Hernández’s rights under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. Although the case posed interesting (and unanswered) questions about the extent to which the Constitution applies at (and just across) the border, it was resolved by the 5thCircuit, the first time around, on the basis of “qualified immunity”—the idea that, even if Mesa did violate Hernández’s rights, it was not “clearly established” at the time of the shooting that Mesa’s conduct was unconstitutional (because it was not “clearly established” if the Constitution applied to Hernández at all).
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementLast June, however, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the 5thCircuit’s decision, ruling that Mesa did not know at the time of the shooting that Hernández was a noncitizen, and therefore could not have known that the person at whom he was shooting might lack constitutional protection. On remand, the 5thCircuit once again sided with Agent Mesa, this time arguing that federal courts generally should not recognize judge-made damages remedies, especially in cases raising the kinds of national security and foreign policy concerns that tend to arise at the border. In so ruling, the 5thCircuit purported to rely on the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Ziglar v. Abbasi, in which a four-justice majority (out of the six justices who heard the case) refused to recognize a damages remedy against senior government officials for their role in the roundup and detention of immigrants who were Muslim and/or of Arab descent after Sept. 11, 2001.
AdvertisementAbbasiis a deeply disturbing decision, both in how it applies (and ignores) prior precedent and in its more fundamental framing of the role of the federal courts vis-à-vis the political branches. But for all its flaws, Abbasi repeatedlystressed that its holding was “not intended to cast doubt on the continued force, or even the necessity” of judge-made damages remedies in search-and-seizure cases, and that “[t]he settled law … in this common and recurrent sphere of law enforcement, and the undoubted reliance upon it as a fixed principle in the law, are powerful reasons to retain [them] in that sphere.” In other words, although Abbasifrowned on judge-made damages remedies to challenge high-level policy decisions by senior government officials in the midst of national security crises, it went out of its way to not similarly disavow damages remedies for “individual instances of … law enforcement overreach.” Only one of the six justices who participated in Abbasi(Clarence Thomas) disagreed.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementMoreover, unlike in Abbasi, the plaintiffs in the Hernández case have no other possible remedy. A federal statute bars them from suing Mesa under state tort law. And as with most claims against rogue law enforcement officers, there is no meaningful opportunity to challenge the officer’s conduct in advance through a suit for declaratory or injunctive relief. Thus, for plaintiffs like Hernández’s parents, the alternative to judge-made damages for Agent Mesa’s allegedly unconstitutional conduct is, well, nothing.
It might be easy to understand, or at least accept, the federal courts’ skepticism at going out of their way to provide remedies in a one-off case, where there is no real concern that the officer’s allegedly unconstitutional conduct could or would recur. But the tragic facts of Hernández’s case are, unfortunately, not the least bit aberrational. The federal appeals court in San Francisco is currently considering similar questions in a case arising out of a fatal cross-border shooting in Arizona, and there was just another fatal shooting by a CBP agent of an unarmed noncitizen along the border near Laredo, Texas. More generally, one need not look far to find CBP agents on the literal and figurative front lines in any number of other contemporary contexts—contexts in which there ought to be common cause in the need to deter constitutional abuse.
To that end, on June 15, we brought the Hernández case back to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to review (and reverse) the 5thCircuit’s ruling and to recognize that the federal courts can indeed hold CBP agents accountable if and when they violate the Constitution. Now more than ever, there ought to be common cause in ensuring that CBP agents act consistently with the Constitution, and in providing remedies to their victims in case in which they don’t.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:新闻中心)
- NYT mini crossword answers for August 29
- Asiad: Yemenis divided by war, united by sport
- 'The Marvels' extra special mid
- How to watch KSU vs. Baylor football without cable: kickoff time, streaming deals, and more
- The Analog Embrace: How Some Experiences Are Surviving the Digital Age
- North Korea says it conducted important test to develop multiple warhead missile
- Male dolphins also try and attract women with gifts, study finds
- Man booked for possession of machete ahead of Halloween
- 进一步加强燃气安全管理工作 有效防范和遏制此类事故发生
- We Bought the Cheapest DDR5 RAM Modules We Could Find, Are They Any Good?
- 10 Ethical Animal Places to Visit in 2019
- A Road Trip Through the Constantly Evolving History of Technology
- 珠海市委书记陈勇:力争地区生产总值增长6%以上,工业投资实现两位数增长
-
Apple iPod: The First 10 Years of the Ubiquitous Media Player
#ThrowbackThursday: The iPod is one of the most iconic devices of the 21st century and the product t ...[详细] -
We fought to be heard: Putellas
GOTHENBURG:Spain's women soccer players said on Thursday the fight they have waged with the coun ...[详细] -
Federer eyes Team Europe’s captaincy
VANCOUVER:Retired tennis legend Roger Federer, who helped Europe win three Laver Cups, hinted he mig ...[详细] -
6 Stunning Sites for Art Lovers in America
Beauty comes in many forms, and often, unexpected places. Whether it’s the work of a world-ren ...[详细] -
This photo, carried on Wednesday, shows the North test-firing a 240mm multiple rocket launcher with ...[详细]
-
Memorial park for independence fighter to open in Kazakhstan
The bust of Hong Beom-do at a memorial park commemorating Hong at his former burial site in Kyzylord ...[详细] -
'The Marvels' did Aladna wrong
The Marvel Cinematic Universe lovesto bring in not only strange new worlds but also strange new mult ...[详细] -
河源市委书记何国森:着力打造“三大样板”,今年GDP力争增长5%以上
河源市委书记何国森:着力打造“三大样板”,今年GDP力争增长5%以上_南方+_南方plus河源着力打造“三大样板”,今年GDP力争增长5%以上。我们将发展壮大“1+3”千亿级百亿级产业集群,集中资源建 ...[详细] -
Campbell highlights Washington Declaration amid security concerns over Putin
U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, center, speaks during a joint press conference at the ...[详细] -
Alabama’s botched execution of Joe Nathan James Jr. showed the cruelty of lethal injections.
Alabama’s execution of Joe Nathan James Jr. last month offered the latest evidence that lethal injec ...[详细]
Supercritical geothermal power: Limitless promise or impossible dream?
N. Korea lobs coastal artillery shells into Yellow, East Seas: S. Korean military
- DOJ accuses TikTok of collecting and sharing users' personal views, as the app fights a ban
- Trump's pick for NASA chief barely makes it through a committee vote
- North Korea raises stakes with 'tactical nuclear' drills
- Yoon pledges to put top priority on stabilizing prices, livelihoods amid global economic challenges
- 采购商+48,英德红茶在泉城济南蹭蹭涨粉
- Threads rolls out 3 handy new features
- ‘NIS meddling in politics with claims of election hacking’: Democratic Party of Korea