The one trap every Trump prosecutor needs to avoid.
Prosecutors in former President Donald Trump’s four criminal cases are knee-deep in producing millions of pages of discovery to ensure he receives a fair trial. The discovery process is not simply a lot of work. It is a land mine for prosecutors—one that has sunk other high-profile cases, such as the 2008 prosecution of then-Sen. Ted Stevens. In the Trump case, the prospects of a discovery error—particularly an accidental one—are significant, and prosecutors must be careful to prevent their cases from imploding on a national stage with some of the highest stakes imaginable.
For 60 years, the Supreme Court’s Bradydoctrine has required prosecutors to turn over all evidence to a defendant that is favorable and material. In many cases, the Bradydisclosures are straightforward. In a murder case, for example, favorable evidence might be an eyewitness pointing to someone else as the possible shooter. Favorable evidence also includes anything that would discredit a prosecution witness, such as expressions of bias or prior inconsistent statements.
To demonstrate a Bradyviolation, the defendant needs to show that the withheld evidence was material. If a defendant raises the Bradyclaim midtrial, the defendant must show that the withheld evidence would lead to an acquittal. If the defendant raises the Bradyclaim after trial, he also has the burden of showing that he would have been found not guilty if the evidence had been disclosed. Materiality can be an obstacle to defendants winning Bradyappeals, but in a complicated factual case like the ones involving Trump, the materiality standard can be easier to meet. In the Trump cases, prosecutors are stitching together a narrative with the testimony of many witnesses who each contribute small but key pieces of the puzzle. If evidence that is withheld would have undermined any one of those puzzle pieces—for example by contradicting a key witness—that may be enough.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementSo how do the Trump prosecutors avoid committing a Bradyviolation? Well, the first step is to know the types of circumstances in which they happen.
Prosecutors commit Bradyviolations in three common situations: First, some prosecutors intentionally hide evidence. Second, prosecutors commit Bradyviolations because they don’t understand the law and inadvertently fail to disclose required evidence. Third, prosecutors fail to turn over evidence held by other members of the “prosecution team,” such as police officers who work outside the prosecutor’s office.
The first two scenarios seem unlikely in the Trump cases. The whole world is watching, so it would be absurd for special counsel Jack Smith and the other prosecutors to intentionally hide evidence. And it seems doubtful that these prosecutors, knowing the stakes, would make a legal mistake about their discovery obligations, rather than simply erring on the side of disclosure.
AdvertisementRelated From Slate
Mark Joseph Stern
The Surprise Ruling That Tosses a Grenade Into the Jan. 6 Prosecutions
Read MoreThe third scenario—turning over all evidence held by the prosecution team—is the trouble spot. The Bradydoctrine provides that prosecutors must turn over evidence not just from their own files but also from the files of everyone on the prosecution team, even if the prosecutors have personally never laid eyes on the evidence.
AdvertisementThe special counsel team, of course, includes prosecutors and FBI agents who have been working on the Trump cases day and night. But that’s not all. There are other federal prosecutors outside the special counsel’s office, such as those who prosecuted the hundreds of defendants who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6. Courts have said that the prosecution team includes other prosecutors with information about the defendant’s case.
AdvertisementThen there are the national security agencies involved in gathering evidence about the attack on the Capitol and the “big lie” to overturn the election. Federal courts have said that these agencies are part of the prosecution team that must produce Bradyevidence. Will the special counsel’s office be able to check through those files?
AdvertisementPopular in News & Politics
- We’ve Been Entertaining an Illusion About the Supreme Court. It’s Finally Been Shattered.
- A Supreme Court Justice Gave Us Alarming New Evidence That He’s Living in MAGA World
- Them Supreme Court Boys Are at It Again
- In a Week Full of Hypocrites, Greg Abbott Came Close to Winning the Crown
And then there’s the House of Representatives’ Jan. 6 committee, which undertook a lengthy investigation of the events at the heart of the D.C. and Georgia criminal cases. Congress is not a law enforcement body. So, in theory, the committee and its dozens of staff are not part of the prosecution team. But we are in uncharted territory. We know little about how closely the special counsel’s team worked with the Jan. 6 committee behind the scenes. It is therefore not outside the realm of possibility that a court could consider the committee’s work to be potential Bradymaterial.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementGiven the scope of the crimes alleged against Trump, there is a mountain of evidence spread all over Washington—not to mention New York, Georgia, Florida, and elsewhere. Highly competent prosecutors have flunked their Bradyobligations in far less complicated situations than this. The special counsel (and prosecutors in Georgia and New York) should therefore have eyes in the back of their heads to look for all possible Bradyevidence. Because the goal of any prosecutor is not just to “win,” but to do so in a way that ensures that the process is fair and that any convictions will be upheld on appeal.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:新闻中心)
- Google Gemini now allows AI
- 'Game of Thrones's hottest new couple are shooting for lead actor Emmys
- 荔枝新品种“香蜜早”通过鉴定, 填补广东特早熟优质荔枝空白
- N. Korea remains one of world's worst human rights violators
- SpaceX Polaris Dawn mission: How to watch the launch
- CPUs Don't Matter For 4K Gaming... Wrong!
- Vietnam orders hotels near Marriott Hotel Hanoi to cancel reservations for summit security: report
- 国网四川检修雅安分部召开成立六周年座谈会
- Tom Brokaw of NBC News accused by 2 women of inappropriate advances
- What Ever Happened to Flickr?
- Businesspeople request access to Gaeseong complex
- 'Avengers: Infinity War' ending: What it means and what's next
- The breakup phone cleanse: How we move on in a digital world
-
Supercritical geothermal power: Limitless promise or impossible dream?
Supercritical geothermal power holds the promise of meeting humanity's energy needs for millions of ...[详细] -
雅安日报讯5日,芦山县人民检察院召开全院干警大会,号召全院干警向遭受“8·3”6.5级地震灾害的云南省鲁甸县人民检察院捐款献爱心。芦山县人民检察院干警纷纷献出自己的爱心,最终共筹集捐款54000余元, ...[详细]
-
Human rights watchdog vows to root out abuse in sports, hate speech
The National Human Rights Commission of Korea will proactively seek to eradicate physical and sexual ...[详细] -
Serena Williams upset: Unseeded Roberta Vinci defeats overwhelming favorite.
Unseeded Italian Roberta Vinci defeated heavy favorite Serena Williams today in the U.S. Open semifi ...[详细] -
Essential Apps to Install on your Windows PC or Mac
You just bought a new laptop, built a new desktop PC, or are simply clean installing on a new solid ...[详细] -
Human rights watchdog vows to root out abuse in sports, hate speech
The National Human Rights Commission of Korea will proactively seek to eradicate physical and sexual ...[详细] -
Slate’s weekly roundup: Jacob Brogan on his week at Slate.
Hi Slate Plus-ians,I’m Jacob Brogan, and I write about technology and culture for Slate. I made my w ...[详细] -
Pick from Amazon Fire and Samsung tablets.
Whether you need a tablet for school, work, or play, today's market has a model to fit every niche a ...[详细] -
PS5 Pro: It looks like a sketch of the design just leaked
After a few quiet months, rumors about Sony's alleged upcoming "PS5 Pro" console are flooding the in ...[详细] -
Larry Harvey, the co-founder of the Burning Man festival who grew it from an event on a San Francisc ...[详细]