Florida Supreme Court destroys precedent protecting mentally disabled people from execution.
On Thursday, the Florida Supreme Court’s new conservative majority allowed the state to resume executing individuals who may be intellectually disabled, shredding a precedent no one asked them to destroy. Its 4–1 decision carves a loophole in state law and grants Florida the authority to kill disabled prisoners who were sentenced under an unconstitutional law. Remarkably, Florida did not even ask the court to overturn this precedent; the conservative justices did so on their own initiative. That astounding breach of judicial protocol has sent shockwaves through the state, further demonstrating that Florida’s high court has embarked upon a political agenda that is far removed from anything that might plausibly be called judging.
The court’s decision in Phillips v. State essentially revives an unconstitutional Florida law. In 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states may not execute “mentally retarded offenders.” Killing people with mental “deficiencies,” the court explained, is a cruel and unusual punishment forbidden by the Eighth Amendment, because these individuals’ “cognitive and behavioral impairments” render them less culpable. Florida, however, continued to sentence intellectually disabled people to death, getting around SCOTUS by imposing a rigid test: Any individual who scores above 70 on an IQ test is, by definition, not intellectually disabled. This rule flies in the face of the scientific consensus, and in 2014’s Hall v. Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court struck it down.
Frank Walls was sentenced to death before Halland denied an opportunity to prove an intellectual disability because he scored an IQ of 72, just above the cutoff. He asked the Florida Supreme Court to apply Hall retroactively, which would give him a new chance to demonstrate his disability at an evidentiary hearing. The court granted his request in 2016’s Walls v. State. It applied its test for retroactivity, which asks whether a constitutional ruling “constitutes a development of fundamental significance.” A ruling meets this test if it places “beyond the authority of the state” the power to “impose certain penalties.” The court easily found that Hall satisfies that standard, because it revoked Florida’s ability to impose death on defendants who are intellectually disabled but still score an IQ above 70.
Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementSince then, the makeup of the court has changed dramatically. Four liberal justices were forced to retire due to age, allowing Republican Govs. Rick Scott and Ron DeSantis to pick conservative successors. Two of DeSantis’ appointees have already been elevated to the federal bench, and the governor has illegally refused to name their replacements. So, today, the Florida Supreme Court has four conservatives, one moderate, and two vacancies. There are no female justices.
One might expect a short-staffed court to display a modicum of modesty before ripping up decades of precedent. This one has not. Its conservative majority quickly got to work overturning progressive decisions they disliked, with a special focus on death jurisprudence. In January, the court let judges impose capital punishment withoutthe unanimous recommendation of a jury, reversing a 2016 precedent. While doing so, the majority gave itself new powers to overturn past decisions with no special justification. Just last week, the same four justices sharply diminished the level of scrutiny applied to criminal convictions that rest solely on circumstantial evidence, even in capital cases.
AdvertisementThe court continued this campaign on Thursday by overturning Walls, the 2016 decision applying Hall retroactively. It used a post-conviction appeal from an intellectually disabled death row inmate, Harry Phillips, as a vehicle for this abrupt reversal. The four conservative justices declared that Hall “merely more precisely defined the procedure” to determine when a capital defendant is intellectually disabled. They asserted that the “categorical prohibition on executing the intellectually disabled was not expanded by Hall.” And they dismissed Hall as nothing more than an “evolutionary refinement” in the law, not a ruling of “fundamental significance.”
AdvertisementThese claims are not just dishonest; they are false. In Hall, SCOTUS declared that “Florida’s law contravenes our Nation’s commitment to dignity.” Its sweeping decision condemned Florida’s rule as a frontal assault on the Eighth Amendment. Hall was not a “refinement” of the law. It placed “beyond the authority of the state” the authority to execute a new class of people: people who score an IQ above 70 but are still intellectually disabled. Any principled interpretation of precedent requires its retroactive application in Florida.
Advertisement AdvertisementWhat’s arguably more disturbing than the court’s decision is the way it reached its conclusions. As SCOTUS recently reminded us, courts are only supposed to decide questions presented by the parties before them; they may not “sally forth each day looking for wrongs to right.” Traditionally, a court will only overturn precedent if a party asks it to. Occasionally, a court may decide, on its own, that it’s time to reconsider a precedent. When that happens, the court typically orders further briefing on the matter, as SCOTUS did in Citizens United. The judiciary is called “the least dangerous branch” in part because of this passivity: Courts cannot insert themselves into a political dispute, but must wait for controversies to come before them.
Advertisement Advertisement AdvertisementThe Florida Supreme Court broke all those rules on Thursday. Florida didn’t ask the court to overturn Walls. The justices did not order more briefing on the issue. Instead, they took it upon themselves to kill off an earlier decision simply because they didn’t agree with it. A court that spontaneously seeks out and repeals old laws it dislikes is not really a court. It is a legislature. There may be no clearer example of unalloyed, unapologetic judicial activism.
Recently in Jurisprudence
- The One Thing Donald Trump Can’t Escape in Court
- After a Rough Week of Testimony, Stormy Daniels Seems to Have the Upper Hand
- It’s a Big Deal That the Government Is Rescheduling Marijuana. It’s Still Too Little, Too Late.
- I Watched Trump’s Lawyers Cross-Examine Stormy Daniels. It Was Painful.
These developments are specific to Florida, but they have national resonance. President Donald Trump has stacked the federal judiciary with conservatives who share the judicial philosophy of the Florida Supreme Court’s majority. Many of them are already gunning for liberal precedents, including Roe v. Wade. These judges have decided that time-honored principles of judicial restraint do not apply to them. They believe they have a mandate to bend the law as far to the right as possible, as quickly as possible—no matter how many laws, precedents, and human lives they trample along the way.
Tweet Share Share Comment(责任编辑:关于我们)
-
iPhone 16 Pro new color will reportedly be Desert Titanium
Apple's upcoming iPhone 16 Pro will come in a new color, a new report claims, and it will be sort-of ...[详细] -
下一个川锅爆款?清远西牛麻竹笋亮相成都_南方+_南方plus“这个笋太嫩了,和火锅是绝配”,11月14日,在成都著名的美食聚集地宽窄巷子,以“蔬中珍品 魅力十‘竹’”为题的清远西牛麻竹笋品牌推介暨产销 ...[详细]
-
超前沿技术、最权威专家、400张入场券!2023水产种业高质量发展论坛,速来!
超前沿技术、最权威专家、400张入场券!2023水产种业高质量发展论坛,速来!_南方+_南方plus吃鱼不用吐刺,养殖鱼的性别体色可人工控制,通过芯片可筛选更抗病的鱼……以水产种业为主题的超前沿生物育 ...[详细] -
翁源开展乡村振兴农业技术培训,助力绿色高质量发展_南方+_南方plus11月10日,翁源县农业技术推广办公室与新江镇联合主办的乡村振兴农业技术培训暨丝苗米示范基地观摩会活动,在新江镇举办,全县水稻甘蔗 ...[详细]
-
Coach jailed for sexual exploitation of underage athlete
A coach for the national jump rope team was sentenced to five years in jail for his yearlong sexual ...[详细] -
雅安日报讯“川台编导来雅挑选雅女参赛。”昨(15)日,四川电视台第二频道编导张艺馨来到雅安,为川台即将推出的一档大型歌唱类节目选拔新星。在得知由雅安日报传媒集团主办,雅安新报承办,雅鹿房产“蒙顶山国际 ...[详细]
-
植保站工作人员到田间查看水稻防治情况雅安日报讯近日,记者从市农业局获悉,由于受前期阴雨寡照天气的影响,全市很多县区不同程度受到了稻瘟病的危害。目前,我市正积极开展穗颈瘟等水稻穗期病虫害的防治工作,确保 ...[详细]
-
电风扇等降暑电器少有人问津看电影的人逐渐增多入夏以来,我市日平均气温低于往年,原本应该火热的空调、冷饮等夏季消费市场也显得较为冷清,然而随着各大中院校和中小学的放假,我市健身房、驾校、电影院等消费市场 ...[详细]
-
What to expect when a tech bubble bursts
Here's what people who weren't there don't know about the moment the dot-com bubble burst: there was ...[详细] -
画山画水更护山护水!岭南山水画家许钦松为绿美广东认捐100棵树
画山画水更护山护水!岭南山水画家许钦松为绿美广东认捐100棵树_南方+_南方plus(画山画水更护山护水!岭南画派大师许钦松认捐100棵树 ,时长共1分23秒)“我是一个山水画家,画山画水,更爱山爱水 ...[详细]